Coding

Part:BBa_K5411016

Designed by: Kento Kiriyama   Group: iGEM24_Kyoto   (2024-09-17)


LeucinzipperAN3.5-GlnR

LeucinzipperA3.5 (BBa_K5411020) is fused to N-terminus of GlnR(BBa_K5411002)


Usage and Biology

GlnR is a transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis. When Bacillus subtilis's glutamine synthetase, GlnA, is feedback-inhibited by its product, glutamine, GlnR gains the ability to bind to specific promoters [1]. GlnR binds to particular DNA sequences, such as the GlnRA promoter, as a dimer. However, due to a self-inhibitory domain located near its C-terminus, GlnR normally cannot dimerize or bind to DNA. In the presence of GlnA-FBI (feedback-inhibited GlnA), this self-inhibitory domain binds to GlnA, neutralizing its inhibitory effect and allowing GlnR to bind to DNA [2][3]. Since GlnA-FBI facilitates GlnR's binding to DNA in a glutamine-dependent manner, GlnR acts as a repressor in Bacillus subtilis's nitrogen response system.

The mechanism involving GlnR has already been applied in an in vivo ammonium biosensor [4]. Inspired by this, Kyoto 2024 designed a cell-free biosensor.

Specifically, GlnR and GlnA are located around the DNA when ammonia concentration increases. By fusing LeucinzipperAN3.5 to GlnR and GlnA, and fusing LeucinzipperBN3.5 to T7RNAP, the interaction between the leucine zippers can induce the recruitment of T7RNAP around the promoter only when ammonia concentration is high and GlnR is bound to the DNA. By using the low-affinity T7Promoter d1 (BBa_K5411028[5]) instead of the regular T7 promoter, transcription can be initiated exclusively through this recruitment mechanism.

Design and modeling

We fused GlnR with a leucine-zipper structure, aiming to add the functionality of the leucine-zipper without affecting the original function of GlnR. Two potential fusion sites were considered: the N-terminus and the linker sequence between Helix 4 and Helix 5. The selected design involved inserting LeucinzipperA3.5 into the linker region.

Data has shown that the presence of a His-tag at the N-terminus does not result in loss of activity [2], leading to the conclusion that introducing a leucine-zipper structure at the N-terminus would be feasible. Ultimately, a design incorporating two GGGGS linkers was employed. Furthermore, simulations using Alphafold3 [6] indicated that the conformational changes were minimal, supporting the suitability of this design.

References

[1]Fisher SH, Wray LV. Bacillus subtilis glutamine synthetase regulates its own synthesis by acting as a chaperone to stabilize GlnR–DNA complexes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(3):1014-1019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709949105
[2]Wray LV, Fisher SH. Bacillus subtilis GlnR contains an autoinhibitory C-terminal domain required for the interaction with glutamine synthetase. Molecular Microbiology. 2008;68(2):277-285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06162.x
[3]Travis BA, Peck JV, Salinas R, et al. Molecular dissection of the glutamine synthetase-GlnR nitrogen regulatory circuitry in Gram-positive bacteria. Nature Communications. 2022;13(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31573-0
[4]Xiao Y, Jiang W, Zhang F. Developing a Genetically Encoded, Cross-Species Biosensor for Detecting Ammonium and Regulating Biosynthesis of Cyanophycin. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2017;6(10):1807-1815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00069
[5]BBa_K5411028
[6]Abramson J, Adler J, Dunger J, et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature. 2024;630:1-3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07487-w


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 325
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


[edit]
Categories
Parameters
None